- ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS ACTIVATION CODE
- ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS PRO
- ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS SOFTWARE
- ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS LICENSE
699#141699 and continuing on the 2nd page. In addition, there are several other settings that can significantly performance for Zerene Stacker. To be effective, that option may also require larger than default memory allocation.
ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS PRO
The main one that affects performance is Options > Preferences > Multiprocessing > "Overlap I/O with computation if possible", which defaults to be on with Pro but off with trial and Personal. There are several options settings that default differently for trial versus Pro licenses.
ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS LICENSE
The lack of license probably will affect performance. Pierre wrote:Unfortunately, I don't have a ZS Pro license yet, so the test will only be performed on a "license expired" version with hope the speed will not be affected. Of course, speed is not all since the only criteria in the end is the result so guess I will end up having both to work with, using ZS for difficult subjects. For the test: both in "standard" parameters a compilation of 145 pictures with Dmap / Method B (both aligned). Unfortunately, I don't have a ZS Pro license yet, so the test will only be performed on a "license expired" version with hope the speed will not be affected. I do not compare both since a few month so, to be fair, I wil download the last version for this run. ZS was written in Java so it is very flexible and works even on linux while HF is more specialized, with gain of the speed. Results seems quite similar, maybe a bit better for hairy subjects. No doubts ZS have some nice option in his sleeves. ZS is even faster and HF improve the retouch capabilities by allowing to include both frames or stacking results + the addition of the "slab" and the capability to stack from video.
To be frank, both program have greatly improved since last year.
ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS SOFTWARE
To my mind, one measure of a software application's prominence is the ecosystem of complementary software that evolves around it. There are other slabbing programs, easily found in a search. More recent, and more refined, is Bugslabber. A slabbing utility I wrote, and share freely, is called SlabberJockey. Slabbing makes retouching difficult subjects easier. This capability has permitted several of us to write-and make available to others-utilities for slabbing (also called "sub-stacking"). All it takes is minor ability to build and edit macros. However, the feature set is pretty deep, and every time I watch a tutorial again, I learn or get reminded of some hotkey or nuance that speeds up my work.Īnother nice thing about Zerene Stacker is its robust batch utility, in which most of the application's capabilities are available for anyone to automate for various purposes. I didn't find the learning curve for Zerene Stacker to be steep, particularly given the excellent tutorials that Rik linked you to. I've been happy with it ever since, though I can't fairly comment on current versions of its competitors. (Standard disclaimer: I wrote that one so I'm biased.)Ī few years ago, I tried then-current versions of all the stacking applications I could find, and chose Zerene Stacker. It works much less well for complex geometries like bristly bugs, so I don't use it much.īy the way, if you're asking in general about focus stacking software, then I'll suggest taking a look also at Zerene Stacker. The 3D function of Helicon Focus works well for simple smooth geometries like the faces of Ray's coins.
ACTIVATION CODE HELICON FOCUS WINDOWS ACTIVATION CODE
For me recovery has been a simple matter of just re-registering on the same computer, using the same activation code they sent me at purchase back in 2008. I too have had a bit of trouble lately with Helicon Focus losing track of its license key, resulting in watermarks and eventual expiration. If high quality is your goal, stay away from that version. HF Lite is attractive because of its low price, but it's crippled by the absence of retouching tools.
My license is effectively Premium, because I purchased separately Helicon Focus Pro and Helicon Remote. Rcroning wrote:Helicon Focus Lite, Pro or Premium - which do you use and why? Is the Lite package a good choice for the beginner?
0 kommentar(er)
